Skip to main content

Classic Review: "Watchmen", 2009 (Brett)

"Watchmen", 2009

*Originally posted by Brett*

Yep, so I watched The Watchmen. HAHA! Get it! Damn, I'm witty.

My initial reaction was that the movie is good, but not amazing.

Let's use a baseball analogy!
The movie was a solid line drive for a double, no RBIs and definitely not a home
run.

Some scenes worked, and worked really well! ex: Jon's visit to Mars, Antartic
Confrontation(s), and anything with Rorschach in it. The film had a good flow -
keeping close to the structure of the book. Furthermore, the detail or the care
put to the mise-en-scene was awesome!

Some scenes didn't work, in fact they were down right awful/awkward. ex: Janey
Slater cancer reveal, and Archie sex scene. Furthermore, the choices of popular
music used in the film was really bad - too distracting and self-referential. I
found myself taken out of the movie whenever they played some awkwardly place
song in the soundtrack. Should have just kept to a modest original score,
perhaps?

Over all, the good scenes saved any bad ones. The film was balanced so that all
acts were poignant and interesting. The movie never fell apart, although there
were some threats here and there.

Moving on, the adaptation as a whole worked for me. I'm not a member of the
cult of the Moore. As a filmmaker, I know things have to be adjusted. For a
narrative film, the story decisions made sense - sure it's always nice to
include that extra bit of story or character, but somethings got to given in
translation from book to film. I actually really liked the changed ending -
while different in use of devices, I thought the spirit and meaning stayed
wholly intact. In fact, it added a new element into the social super hero
dilemma. What happens when your savior becomes your executioner?

With that said, a change from book to film that did give me pause was how
Rorschach deals with the child kidnapper. I thought it was too direct of an
action for Rorschach, his emotion taking over his cold, psychotic intellect.
His actions always seemed planned and methodical - with purpose. Rorschach
loses his whole being here to physical brutality instead of the psychological
brutality we expect from him.

So...yea, that's about it. I'm curious how another director would have handled
the material given the same respect for the source material? I guess we'll find
out in twenty years when Hollywood decides to remake it.

Stuff in this movie:
-boobies
-softcore sex scene to excite all the teenage boys
-big blue wiener
-bodies exploding into giblets
-Rorschach
-dialogue with multi-syllable words that will go over most dumb American's heads
-slow motion

Beverages consumed during this movie: none, but I was damn thirsty

Next movie: I DON'T KNOW!




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Review: "Naked", 1993/ "After Hours", 1988 (Vince)

Naked", 1993/ "After Hours" 1988 *Originally posted by Vince* I already know no one will watch "Koko: A Talking Gorilla" so I tried to think of a film that someone would actually watch. I recommend 2 films, both of which take place deep into the night & add a certain grimyness to the proceedings. 1) Naked (1993) by Mike Leigh & 2) After Hours (1985) by Martin Scorsese. Both of them are episodic. Both could seem to lack a meaning while watching (or after for that matter). Both deal with sad lonely people. Out of the two, NAKED is the one that will make you feel shitty afterward. I will quote the All Movie Guide as I can't write anything better: "Both hailed and criticized for its bleakness and its basically brutal treatment of women, Naked is an intensely powerful and disturbing motion picture experience. Director Mike Leigh is making a pull-no-punches statement about late 20th century Britain, specifically about the manner in which social syste...

Classic Review: "Coraline", 2009 (Brett)

"Coraline", 2009 *Originally posted by Brett* So apparently, Henry Selick is growing tired of goth. After two movies celebrating goth sensibilities with childlike glee, he must have asked himself, "What do I do next?" So Henry, like a true artist, decided to evolve and advance his creative endeavors to a new challenge - the stylistic glamour of EMO! Coraline is actually a pretty damn good movie. The protagonist namesake has mommy/daddy issues, "They don't pay attention to me!" (like a good pre-pubescent emo should). Fortunately for her, she finds a magic hole in the wall that takes her to a world mirroring her own except it's everything she ever hoped for - family love, home cooked meals, and all that bullshit. But is everything as good as it seems?! BWA HAHAHAHAH! *cough* I wouldn't be surprised if Henry Selick was raised on Edward Gorey stories. He definitly can't stay away from the macabre. Add in Neil Gaiman, and a dash of Lewis Caroll,...

"Ace in the Hole", 1951 (Mike)

"Ace in the Hole", 1951 No, my first film is not gay porn starring some guy named Ace. Billy Wilder. Kurt Douglas plays an ego-maniacal newspaper reporter that "discovers" a human-interest story with some guy who is stuck in a collapsed mine. Good ol' Kurt decides to keep the guy in the hole so he can create more hype around the story. Off the wall and a great comment on even today's media-crazed world. Try it out and let me know. Film was watched consuming the wonderful El Toro Golden Ale. Originally written March 14th, 2009